House of Representatives Calls 40+ Social Media Personalities to Testify on Fake News and Disinformation

Wazzup Pilipinas!?

The Philippine House of Representatives is set to hold a highly anticipated hearing on Tuesday, February 4, 2025, tackling one of the most pressing issues in the digital age: fake news and disinformation.

Led by the House Tri-Committee—which includes the Committees on Public Order and Safety, Public Information, and Information and Communications Technology—the inquiry aims to examine the widespread proliferation of false information online, its implications on national security, and potential policy measures to curb its impact.

The Big Question: Who is Responsible for Fake News?

To gain deeper insights, over 40 influential social media personalities have been invited to serve as resource persons. Among them are prominent figures known for their strong online presence, particularly pro-Duterte influencers, such as:

Sass Rogando Sasot

Lorraine Marie Badoy-Partosa

Jeffrey Almendras Celiz

Lord Byron Cristobal (Banat By)

Claire Eden Contreras (Maharlika Boldyakera)

Other notable invitees include political analysts, legal professionals, bloggers, and content creators who have shaped online discourse in recent years. The list includes:

Malou Tiquia

Jose Yumang Sonza

Krizette Lauretta Chu

Mark Anthony Lopez

MJ Quiambao Reyes

Vivian Zapata Rodriguez

Ethel Pineda

Alex Destor (Tio Moreno)

Aaron Peña (Old School Pinoy)

Glen Chong

Manuel Mata Jr. (Kokolokoy)

Elizabeth Joie Cruz (Joie De Vivre)

Claro Ganac

Jonathan Morales

Cyrus Preglo (Optics Politics)

Maricar Serrano

Ernesto S. Abines Jr. (Jun Abines)

Atty. Trixie Cruz Angeles

Julius Melanosi Maui (Maui Spencer)

Darwin Salceda (Boss Dada TV)

Elmer Jugalbot (Eb Jugalbot)

Cathy Binag

MJ Mondejar

Suzanne Batalla (IamShanwein)

Joe Smith Medina (Political Witch Boy)

Jeffrey G. Cruz (JCCO / JJ Cruz)

Alven L. Montero

Kester Ramon John Balibalos Tan (Mr Realtalker)

Edwin Jamora (Reyna Elena)

Ma Florinda Espenilla-Duque (Pebbles Duque)

Dr. Richard Tesoro Mata (Dr. Richard and Erika Mata)

Ahmed Paglinawan (Luminous by Trixie & Ahmed)

Ryan Lingo

Atty. Enzo Recto (Atty. Ricky Tomotorgo)

Ross Flores Del Rosario (Wazzup Pilipinas)

Ross Flores Del Rosario, the founder of Wazzup Pilipinas, is a particularly notable inclusion. Known for his fearless and credible approach to online journalism, Del Rosario has built Wazzup Pilipinas into one of the most influential digital news platforms in the Philippines, covering major national and global issues.

Government’s Stand Against Fake News

Laguna Representative Dan Fernandez, Chair of the Committee on Public Order and Safety, has been vocal about the dangers of online disinformation.

"We will not allow social media to be used to deceive our countrymen. It is time to implement stricter laws to combat fake news and disinformation," Fernandez declared.

The hearing aims to identify weaknesses in existing digital policies and introduce stronger measures to regulate misleading content. Fernandez also stressed that fake news creates fear and division among Filipinos and must be stopped before it undermines democracy.

Tech Giants Under Scrutiny

The committee has also invited representatives from major social media platforms—Google, Meta (Facebook), and ByteDance (TikTok)—to provide insights into how their platforms handle fake news and what measures they have in place to prevent the spread of disinformation.

Tech companies have been under global pressure to strengthen their fact-checking efforts and increase accountability for content creators and misinformation peddlers. Their testimony in this hearing is expected to shed light on how the Philippines can enforce stricter regulations moving forward.

A Critical Turning Point for Digital Policy

With the increasing role of social media in shaping public opinion, this historic hearing could mark a turning point for digital governance in the Philippines. The presence of influential content creators—including those who have been accused of spreading fake news—could lead to heated debates and eye-opening revelations.

Will this investigation expose who is truly responsible for fake news? Or will it be used as a platform to defend and justify the online behavior of the invited personalities?

The nation watches closely as the House of Representatives takes on the challenge of dismantling the growing culture of disinformation.

What are your thoughts on this controversial hearing? Do you think it will be effective in combating fake news? Let us know in the comments!

The Rise of Social Media Influencers in Philippine Elections: Comelec Eyes Regulation and Taxation

Wazzup Pilipinas!?

Gone are the days when only celebrities, athletes, religious leaders, and business moguls were the go-to endorsers of political candidates. In today’s digital age, politicians are now tapping into the power of social media influencers to amplify their campaigns. Recognizing this shift, the Commission on Elections (Comelec) has set its sights on regulating and scrutinizing campaign expenditures involving these digital personalities.

The Growing Influence of Social Media in Political Campaigns

Over the past decade, social media has evolved into a powerful tool for political campaigns. From paid advertisements to organic content, politicians have learned to leverage digital platforms to reach voters. In 2019, Comelec introduced new guidelines requiring candidates to declare their spending on social media ads and sponsored posts. These rules applied to both direct campaign materials and content created by influencers, regardless of whether they were in favor of or against a candidate. (Rappler)

Comelec’s Plan to Regulate and Tax Influencers

In July 2024, Comelec Chairman George Garcia announced the commission’s intent to collaborate with the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) to impose taxes on social media influencers who profit from endorsing political candidates. Garcia stated, “We want to tie up with BIR so that influencers will be properly taxed.” This initiative aims to ensure that influencers, like other campaign service providers, are held accountable for their earnings. (Philstar Life)

Beyond taxation, Comelec is also looking into setting regulations for the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and social media in campaigns. The goal is to prevent potential abuses, such as misinformation and deepfake content, which could manipulate public perception. Furthermore, Comelec seeks to work closely with major social media platforms to enforce these new policies. (Malaya)

Challenges in Regulating Social Media Campaigns

While Comelec has already taken steps to regulate social media usage in elections, enforcing these rules remains a challenge. In 2019, the commission announced that it would monitor social media influencers engaged in political campaigns. Comelec spokesperson James Jimenez emphasized that “social media associates,” including paid influencers and digital campaigners, must submit reports detailing their earnings and the nature of their services, such as creating content for or against a candidate. (Rappler)

However, tracking these transactions remains complex, given the informal and sometimes undisclosed nature of influencer partnerships. With the rise of influencer marketing, many digital personalities receive compensation in the form of cash, gifts, or sponsorship deals, making it difficult to monitor actual spending.

Addressing the Rapid Evolution of Political Campaigns

As technology continues to shape the way elections are conducted, Comelec is adapting its policies to ensure fair and transparent electoral practices. The commission’s latest efforts aim to strike a balance between embracing digital advancements and preventing their misuse in the political landscape.

The rise of social media influencers in political campaigns introduces new challenges in regulation and taxation. As Comelec works towards a more structured and transparent approach, voters must remain vigilant and discerning, especially in an era where digital content can easily influence public opinion. Will these regulatory efforts be enough to maintain the integrity of elections, or will politicians and influencers find new ways to bypass them? The 2025 elections may serve as a critical test for the future of digital campaigning in the Philippines.

Recommendations for Lawmakers on Social Media Accountability and Digital Well-being

Wazzup Pilipinas!?

Th upe Digital Battlefield—A Call for Urgent Action

In today’s hyperconnected world, social media is more than just a platform—it’s a battlefield for truth, identity, and mental well-being. Every second, billions of posts flood our screens, shaping public opinion, influencing elections, and even endangering lives. Yet, behind the seemingly harmless scroll lies an unchecked digital landscape, where misinformation spreads like wildfire, cyberbullying ruins lives, and tech giants operate with minimal accountability.

In light of the upcoming House Committee Inquiry on Social Media Accountability and Digital Well-being, these recommendations provide a balanced approach to legislation that promotes online safety, authenticity, and responsible digital engagement while respecting free speech and innovation.

1. Enhancing Social Media Accountability

A. Stronger Data Privacy and Cybersecurity Measures

Amend the Data Privacy Act of 2012 (RA 10173)

Require social media platforms to store Philippine user data within the country to prevent data breaches and foreign interference.

Mandate social media companies to report cybersecurity incidents within 24-48 hours to the National Privacy Commission (NPC).

Mandatory Cybersecurity Audits

Require annual security audits for social media platforms to assess data protection measures and prevent cybercrimes.

Establish penalties for platforms that fail to safeguard user data, similar to the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).

B. Local Registration for Social Media Platforms

Require foreign social media companies to register a legal entity in the Philippines under DICT regulations, ensuring compliance with local laws.

Implement a tax structure for digital platforms, with a portion allocated to government programs on cybersecurity, digital literacy, and cybercrime prevention.

C. Ethical Standards for Social Media Influencers and Content Creators

Establish a National Digital Content Regulatory Board under MTRCB and DICT to oversee content creators, vloggers, and influencers.

Require all influencers with more than 100,000 followers to register under this board for accountability.

Implement disclosure guidelines for sponsored content, especially political and advocacy-related materials, similar to Federal Trade Commission (FTC) guidelines in the U.S.

2. Ensuring Authenticity in Digital Communications

A. Strengthening RA 10175 (Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012)

Expand legal coverage to include:

Doxxing (publishing private information without consent).

AI-generated disinformation (deepfake videos, manipulated content).

Online gender-based violence (harassment, stalking, cyber sexual abuse).

Improve Enforcement

Create a National Cybercrime Reporting System (similar to the US Cyber Tipline) where users can directly report cybercrimes to the DICT and NBI.

Strengthen coordination between the PNP Anti-Cybercrime Group (PNP-ACG) and DOJ Cybercrime Office to ensure faster investigation and response.

B. Mandatory Digital Literacy Education

Integrate Digital Literacy into K-12 & Higher Education

Implement "Digital Ethics & Media Literacy" subjects in schools under DepEd and CHED, covering topics like:

Identifying misinformation & fake news.

Cybersecurity & safe digital practices.

Responsible online communication & civic engagement.

Require Digital Ethics Training for Government Employees & Corporations

Government employees and private sector workers should undergo annual cybersecurity & digital ethics training to prevent data leaks, cybercrimes, and online abuse.

C. Stricter Regulations on Deepfake & AI-Generated Content

Mandatory AI-Generated Content Labeling

Require explicit watermarking on AI-generated images, videos, and audio to prevent manipulation and deception in political campaigns and social discourse.

Ban the Unauthorized Use of AI for Political Propaganda

Prohibit the use of AI-generated deepfake videos for political campaigns, fraud, and character defamation.

D. Mandatory Public Disclosures for Political & Sponsored Content

Require social media platforms and influencers to disclose all political advertising and sponsorships in a public database.

Implement clear labeling for all paid political ads and endorsements to combat misinformation and manipulative narratives.

3. Advancing Digital Well-Being

A. Mental Health Safeguards in Social Media Use

Require social media platforms to implement mental health warnings

Introduce "Time Limits & Digital Well-being Alerts" for excessive usage.

Provide in-app mental health resources & crisis hotline links for users experiencing online abuse.

Stronger Measures Against Cyberbullying & Harassment

Establish a fast-track system for removing online harassment content, especially for minors.

Implement stricter penalties for repeated offenders engaging in cyberbullying.

B. Safe Digital Spaces for Minors

Introduce Online Age Verification & Child Protection Mechanisms

Require stricter parental controls & identity verification for users under 18.

Ban the monetization of exploitative child content in family vlogs & streaming platforms.

Stronger School-Based Cyber Protection Programs

Require schools to monitor and address cyberbullying cases proactively through DICT & DepEd partnerships.

Develop an anonymous reporting system for students facing online harassment.

4. Legislative & Policy Actions

A. Creation of a National Digital Rights & Responsibility Act

Introduce a comprehensive law defining the rights and responsibilities of digital citizens, including:

Freedom from cyber harassment & misinformation

Right to digital privacy & fair online treatment

Legal accountability for misuse of social media platforms

B. Support for Independent Fact-Checking Organizations

Provide government-backed grants for independent fact-checking organizations, like Vera Files and Rappler’s Fact-Check Initiative, to strengthen the fight against disinformation.

Require social media platforms to work with accredited fact-checkers for misinformation moderation.

C. Whistleblower Protection for Social Media Moderators & Content Monitors

Establish legal protections for employees of tech companies who expose unethical content moderation practices or internal corruption.

Enforce accountability measures on social media executives who allow the unchecked spread of misinformation and harmful content.

D. Stronger Government-Media-Platform Collaboration

Require regular consultations between Congress, media organizations, and social media platforms to assess digital threats and misinformation trends.

Implement a quarterly reporting system for tech companies, requiring transparency on content moderation policies and cybersecurity measures.

These recommendations present a balanced, enforceable, and future-proof legislative approach to addressing digital accountability, misinformation, and online safety. Lawmakers, regulatory bodies, and private stakeholders must work together to create a digital environment that prioritizes transparency, ethics, and public well-being.

A Digital Future Worth Fighting For

The stakes have never been higher. Our democracy, personal privacy, and mental well-being are under siege in the digital age. Without decisive action, we risk a future where deepfakes rewrite history, cybercriminals roam unchecked, and the Filipino people remain voiceless in the algorithms that dictate their reality.

But the future is not yet written. We stand at a crossroads—where lawmakers, industry leaders, and citizens must choose between complacency and action, regulation and chaos, accountability and anarchy.

This is more than a policy debate; it is a fight for truth over deception, safety over exploitation, and responsibility over profit. The time for half-measures is over. The Philippines must lead by example, proving that a free and open digital world can also be a safe and ethical one.

The battle begins now. The question is: Will we win it?