BREAKING

Saturday, February 1, 2025

The Relentless Need to Keep Going: Lessons on Life, Grief, and Resilience


Wazzup Pilipinas!?


Ernest Hemingway once wrote, "The hardest lesson I’ve had to learn as an adult is the relentless need to keep going, no matter how shattered I feel inside." These words resonate deeply because they hold a raw, unflinching truth about the human experience. Life, with all its complexities and challenges, doesn’t pause for our grief, our exhaustion, or our emotional upheaval. It marches forward, demanding that we keep pace, even when we feel like we're falling apart.


As children, we are taught to dream of happy endings—stories where love conquers all, where hardship is overcome, and where everything eventually falls into place. But adulthood strips away the comfort of those narratives and reveals a harsh reality: survival is rarely glamorous or dramatic. More often than not, it involves quiet strength—masking the fractures within and showing up even when we want nothing more than to retreat. Adulthood teaches us that we must endure, step by painful step, despite the weight of life bearing down on us.


The Truth About Survival: Enduring Through the Pain

One of the most difficult truths of adult life is that we are constantly called upon to endure. We may not be prepared for it, but somehow, we find the strength to keep moving forward. This quiet resilience, while not as loud or visible as some may expect, is powerful in its own right. It’s found in the moments when we choose to face the world when all we want to do is hide. It’s found in those small steps, those silent acts of defiance against life’s cruelty.


There are times when it feels impossible to continue, when we question our strength and our will to keep going. But even in our darkest moments, we discover that we are capable of more than we ever imagined. In the face of deep grief, loss, and trauma, we find reservoirs of strength that had previously been hidden. Through the cracks, the pieces of our broken hearts, we learn to rebuild—not into what we once were, but into someone stronger, wiser, and more compassionate.


The Unthinkable Loss and the Journey of Healing

The toughest lessons often come with the heaviest burdens, and for many, grief becomes a defining experience. Loss—especially the loss of a loved one—is a wound that changes us in ways we never thought possible. The death of a child, the murder of a close loved one, the agony of a broken family—these experiences fracture us, and the aftermath often feels like an insurmountable mountain to climb.


One individual reflects on their grief after losing their only child, Matthew, at the age of 25. After two years of raw sorrow, they are just now beginning to think about creating a “new normal.” This grief has been deeper and more complex than any other loss they have faced in the past. Despite enduring the pain of losing a loved one to murder, surviving a miscarriage, watching a brother fall to drugs, and seeing family members age and pass away, nothing prepared them for the depth of grief that follows the death of a child.


Grief is not linear. It doesn't come with a set timeline or clear stages of healing. It is messy, unpredictable, and devastating. But even amidst the sadness, there is a quiet process of healing. The person who grieves learns to live with the pain, to accept that they will never be the same, and to find ways to move forward. Over time, they come to understand that the moments of true happiness are worth celebrating, that joy can exist alongside the sorrow, and that healing isn’t about forgetting but about learning to live with the grief.


The Parent’s Dilemma: Letting Go and Watching Them Grow

Another painful lesson of adulthood is the realization that no matter how much we protect and guide our children, they will eventually leave us to carve out their own paths. This lesson is gut-wrenching for parents who have dedicated their lives to raising their children, only to find that the inevitable process of growth requires their children to step away, often causing a deep sense of loss for the parent.


It’s a feeling of the heart breaking in two—proud of their independence but devastated by the space they now occupy in the world outside of our protective grasp. It’s the pain of knowing that we cannot shield them from every hurt or hardship, that they must experience their own challenges in order to grow. And yet, it’s also the beauty of this truth: seeing them thrive, seeing them find their way, even as we hold the pieces of our hearts that they take with them.


The act of letting go—whether it’s of a child, a loved one, or a dream—requires great strength. But it also offers the gift of perspective: we learn to accept that growth often involves pain, that true love sometimes means giving others the freedom to find themselves, even if it means stepping away from us.


Embracing the Mess of Life

Life’s most difficult lessons often come when we least expect them. The world doesn’t wait for us to be ready; it keeps moving, and so must we. We learn that life is terribly unfair, that happiness is fleeting, and that we must learn to appreciate the good times and endure the bad. But through it all, there is one undeniable truth: we keep moving forward.


Even when the journey feels impossible, when the world seems too heavy to carry, we find a way to take another step. Every small act of endurance, every quiet moment of resilience, is a testament to the human spirit’s ability to survive and to grow. We learn to live alongside our grief, to embrace the messiness of life, and to find joy in the little things—those moments of peace amidst the chaos.


So, what’s the hardest lesson you’ve had to learn as an adult? How has it shaped who you are today? The answer may vary for each of us, but in the end, it’s the lessons that come from our most difficult experiences that define us. It’s through these trials that we learn our true capacity for resilience, compassion, and strength.

More Roads? Or Just Clear the Ones We Have? Bong Nebrija's Call for Action


Wazzup Pilipinas!?



Manila’s infamous traffic congestion has long been a nightmare for commuters, businesses, and government planners alike. Recently, some political candidates proposed the construction of additional roads and parking spaces as a solution. However, one man wasn’t buying it—Edison “Bong” Nebrija, the former MMDA Task Force Special Operations head, had a simpler yet more logical response:


"We can’t even keep the roads we have now free from obstructions. And you want to build more?"


Instead of new roads, Nebrija has long advocated for something far more practical—clearing Manila’s existing roads of illegal vendors, unauthorized parking, barangay-owned businesses like car washes, and even basketball courts that have taken over the streets.



The Real Traffic Villains: Obstructions Everywhere

It’s no secret that many of Manila’s streets are barely usable, not because they lack space, but because they are filled with obstacles that should not be there in the first place. Consider these persistent issues:


Illegally parked vehicles with “permits” – Whether it’s barangay officials issuing questionable parking passes or local businesses treating public roads as their private garages, these vehicles clog vital arteries.

Sidewalk vendors and makeshift stalls – Entire sidewalks have been transformed into marketplaces, forcing pedestrians onto the roads, reducing traffic flow, and increasing the risk of accidents.

Barangay halls and car washes on public property – Some barangays have taken things even further, occupying sidewalks and even portions of roads for their own offices or profit-driven services.

Basketball courts in the middle of the street – As absurd as it sounds, some streets have been turned into permanent sports venues, making vehicle passage impossible.

Despite multiple clearing operations by the MMDA in the past, the obstructions always seem to return. This raises the question: Are local government units (LGUs) really serious about solving traffic, or are they just tolerating (or even benefiting from) these illegal activities?


Bong Nebrija’s Fight Against Obstructions

During his time at the MMDA, Nebrija led countless clearing operations aimed at reclaiming public roads. His strict, no-nonsense approach made him a well-known figure, often butting heads with those who resisted road-clearing efforts.


In 2018, under then-MMDA Chairman Danilo Lim, Nebrija led one of the most aggressive crackdowns on road obstructions. One of his most famous encounters was with barangay officials who refused to dismantle their illegally placed structures. “This is not your property! This belongs to the public!” he was quoted as saying.


Even as late as 2022, Nebrija was still leading MMDA operations to rid the roads of encroachments, from illegal car repair shops to food stalls. But time and again, these obstructions reappeared, showing the lack of long-term enforcement from local officials.


The MMDA’s Ongoing Struggle

Despite Nebrija’s efforts, Manila’s road-clearing problem remains unresolved. The MMDA continues to conduct operations, but the challenge is ensuring these efforts are sustained.


January 2023 - The MMDA intensified its clearing operations in Baclaran, one of the most notorious areas for sidewalk obstructions.

August 2021 – The MMDA warned motorists against parking on sidewalks and main roads, yet the problem persists today. 

October 2022 – Authorities dismantled an illegal DIY car wash that was blocking a major access road. 

Despite these actions, many LGUs seem unwilling—or unable—to keep their areas clear. The question remains: Is the problem really traffic, or is it political will?


The Wrong Solution: More Roads?

The idea of building new roads seems logical at first glance. After all, more space for cars should mean less congestion, right? But urban planners have repeatedly warned that this is a short-term fix that doesn’t address the real issue.


More roads encourage more cars. Studies worldwide have shown that when new roads are built, people simply buy more vehicles, leading to the same traffic congestion all over again.

Road widening often leads to more obstructions. If the government can’t even keep existing roads clear, what guarantee is there that new roads won’t suffer the same fate?

Public transport, not private cars, should be the priority. Even President Bongbong Marcos himself has said that mass transit is the real solution to traffic, not just more roads. 


The Right Solution: Enforce the Law

Instead of spending billions on new roads that will likely suffer the same fate, why not maximize the ones we already have? Nebrija’s argument is simple:


Clear existing roads of obstructions. Remove illegal vendors, parked cars, barangay-owned businesses, and any structures that do not belong on public roads.

Strictly enforce existing traffic laws. The MMDA and LGUs must ensure that clear roads remain clear, rather than allowing encroachers to return.

Improve public transportation. Instead of promoting car ownership, the government should focus on making public transport more reliable, efficient, and accessible.


Conclusion: A Wake-Up Call for LGUs

Bong Nebrija may no longer be with the MMDA, but his message remains relevant today: Manila doesn’t need more roads—it needs discipline, enforcement, and political will.


Until barangays, mayors, and other local officials start taking responsibility for their areas, traffic in Manila will remain a nightmare—regardless of how many new roads we build.


The real solution isn’t about expansion; it’s about accountability.

David D’Angelo Calls Out Unfair Selection in Senatorial Debates: Are All Candidates Given a Fair Chance?



Wazzup Pilipinas!?



As the 2025 midterm elections approach, the battle for visibility among senatorial candidates is heating up. However, one glaring issue has come to the forefront—the exclusion of lesser-known candidates from major media-organized debates.


This concern was recently voiced by senatorial candidate David D'Angelo, who revealed that he was not invited to GMA Network's pre-recorded senatorial debate, which will air on February 1, 2025. According to him, the selection process prioritized candidates ranking high in the latest SWS and Pulse Asia surveys, leaving out those who may have strong platforms but lack mainstream recognition.


"It is unfortunate that we had not been invited and included in the GMA pre-recorded debate… Based on the reply I received, those who are invited are still based on survey results. So, if you’re not popular or ranking high, you won’t be invited," D'Angelo lamented.


While he acknowledged the importance of debates, he emphasized that the media should be responsible for giving all candidates a fair chance to present their plans for the country. Without this, he warned, the public is left with a limited selection of candidates who already have name recognition, often due to political dynasties or celebrity status.


Should Debates Be Exclusive? The Media’s Role in Fair Elections

The Commission on Elections (Comelec) has expressed willingness to host election debates ahead of the 2025 midterms. However, Comelec Chairman George Erwin Garcia clarified that the responsibility lies with media organizations to conduct and organize these debates, with Comelec playing only a supervisory role.


This brings up an important question: Should major networks like GMA-7, ABS-CBN, and TV 5 continue selecting candidates based on popularity, or should they include all aspirants for a more democratic discourse?


A common defense for limiting debate participants is practicality—with over 80 candidates vying for Senate seats, it is difficult to accommodate everyone. However, a potential solution is conducting debates in batches, allowing a fairer distribution of airtime among all candidates.


Many critics argue that mainstream media should serve the Filipino people, not political interests. If they continue prioritizing only the most famous or well-funded candidates, they deprive the public of valuable insights from other qualified contenders.


The Power of Media in Shaping Elections

The administration's senatorial slate for 2025 already includes high-profile names such as:

✅ Interior Secretary Benhur Abalos

✅ Senator Pia Cayetano

✅ Former Senator Manny Pacquiao

✅ House Deputy Speaker Ralph Recto

✅ Senator Bong Go


While these candidates have the advantage of name recall and political machinery, they do not necessarily represent the full spectrum of ideas available to the Filipino electorate.


Independent and less-publicized candidates often come with fresh perspectives on governance, transparency, and economic reform—issues that political dynasties and career politicians may not prioritize. Unfortunately, their messages often go unheard due to lack of media exposure.


A Call for Fairness in 2025

David D’Angelo’s case is just one example of a systemic issue in Philippine elections. If democracy is to be truly upheld, all candidates must be given equal opportunity to reach the people.


With the elections fast approaching, it is crucial for:

▶ Media organizations to ensure that debates are inclusive and balanced.

▶ Regulatory bodies like Comelec to step in and promote fairer election coverage.

▶ Voters to seek out information beyond what mainstream media presents.


Filipinos deserve a comprehensive view of all candidates, not just those who have been pre-selected by survey rankings and media networks.


If media companies truly serve the people, they must level the playing field and let all voices be heard. Because in a democracy, every candidate deserves a chance—and every voter deserves the full picture.

Ang Pambansang Blog ng Pilipinas Wazzup Pilipinas and the Umalohokans. Ang Pambansang Blog ng Pilipinas celebrating 10th year of online presence
 
Copyright © 2013 Wazzup Pilipinas News and Events
Design by FBTemplates | BTT