Is Diwata Pares Overload's popularity dwindling?

Wazzup Pilipinas!?



The popularity of Diwata Pares Overload, a popular food establishment in the Philippines, does not appear to be dwindling. In fact, the brand is expanding with a new branch recently opened in Quezon City, which suggests growing demand and continued success​.

Diwata, also known as Deo Balbuena, has become a well-known figure in the food industry with a strong following, partly due to their innovative offerings and affordable prices​.


Several notable personalities have visited Diwata Pares Overload, a popular eatery known for its unique take on the traditional Filipino dish "pares." Among these visitors are:

Korina Sanchez - The veteran news anchor and television host visited Diwata Pares Overload and shared her experience on social media. She praised the unique ingredients used in the dish and even gifted the owner, Diwata, a pair of white slippers with her signature​.

Marvin Agustin - Actor and chef Marvin Agustin visited Diwata Pares Overload and featured it on his vlog "Sige Ngaaa." He not only tasted the famous "Pares Overload" but also engaged in fun activities with Diwata, such as playing traditional Filipino games​.

Rosmar - A popular beauty and skincare brand, partnered with Diwata Pares Overload to leverage the latter's strong presence in the food industry. This collaboration allowed Rosmar to tap into a different customer base, enhancing brand visibility and potentially attracting new customers from Diwata Pares Overload's loyal clientele. By joining forces, both brands could benefit from cross-promotion, creating a unique marketing opportunity that aligns their respective strengths and audiences. This strategic partnership aimed to combine their market reach, driving mutual growth and expanding their influence in their respective industries.These visits by prominent figures have contributed to the growing popularity of Diwata Pares Overload, highlighting its unique offerings and the inspiring story of its owner​.

Are the negative reviews about Diwata Pares Overload true?

Diwata Pares Overload has garnered mixed reviews. Positive feedback highlights the generous portions and affordability, with meals priced at just 100 pesos including unlimited rice and soup plus a soft drink.

However, some reviews point out that while the food is decent, it may not meet everyone's taste expectations.

Some patrons enjoy the affordable meals, which include dishes like their unique "fried siken" (fried chicken)​. However, there are also negative reviews, with some individuals expressing disappointment with the taste and overall quality of the food​.

In summary, Diwata Pares Overload seems to be a hit-or-miss experience depending on personal taste and expectations.

For instance, columnist Ogie Diaz mentioned that although the pares was satisfactory for its price, it wasn't extraordinary enough to crave daily​. On TikTok, a user named Hagar Hussein shared a less favorable experience, indicating that their visit did not meet their expectations​.

While Diwata Pares Overload offers good value for money and has many satisfied customers which were categorised as the "masa" or the common people from the lower class of society, namely "mahihirap" who are "sanay sa mga pagkaing simple" and prefer to dine on food with bigger portions or serving and have the liking for "unlimited" or eat all you can, it might not be to everyone's liking. Individual experiences can vary, so it may be worth trying it yourself to form your own opinion.

Complaints about sanitation and cleanliness at Diwata Pares Overload also are in the news.

The business recently faced another closure order from the city hall, citing unspecified violations. This has led to public outcry and support for Diwata, as many believe the enforcement of regulations might be disproportionately harsh compared to other local businesses​.

Diwata has expressed frustration over the closure, maintaining that all necessary requirements were met. The ongoing issues underscore the challenges small business owners face in maintaining compliance while striving to offer affordable and popular food options​.

Diwata has also expressed plans to expand their business across Luzon, Visayas, and Mindanao, indicating strategic growth and ambition to reach a wider market​​.

Despite some competition and imitation, Diwata remains a popular and resilient figure in the culinary scene​.

The Paradox of Publicity: Why Bad Publicity Can Be Good for You

Wazzup Pilipinas!?

Really? GMA? LOL walang duda kung bakit bumagsak ang ratings ng Black Rider. Binigyan pa talaga ng exposure at platform yung mas malansa pa sa sardinas. Yuck! Tito Mars! 

Bakit kinuha pa ng Black Rider yang si Tito Mars? Lalong bumaba ang ratings niyang show sa GMA. Sana si Hiwaga nalang kunin niyo panlaban kay Diwata ng Batang Quiapo.

Siguro kaya kinuha ng Black Rider si Tito Mars, para mabugbog nila roon gamit ang excuse na casting.

Publicity is a double-edged sword in the world of business and personal branding. The common adage "there's no such thing as bad publicity" suggests that all exposure, whether positive or negative, can ultimately benefit an individual or organization. While it might seem counterintuitive, there are several reasons why bad publicity can indeed be advantageous. This article delves into the dynamics of negative publicity and elucidates why it can sometimes be more beneficial than having no publicity at all.

1. Increased Visibility

One of the most immediate benefits of bad publicity is increased visibility. Controversial events or statements often draw significant media attention, placing the subject at the forefront of public discourse. This heightened visibility can be a double-edged sword, but for many brands, it results in greater name recognition and public awareness. In a crowded market, simply being noticed can be a significant advantage.

For instance, consider the case of celebrities who remain in the public eye through scandals. Their constant presence in tabloids and news outlets ensures they stay relevant. A study by Jonah Berger of the University of Pennsylvania found that even negative reviews can increase sales by boosting awareness, especially for lesser-known products .

2. Provoking Thought and Discussion

Bad publicity can stimulate debate and discussion, engaging audiences in a way that positive news might not. When a brand or individual sparks controversy, it often leads to widespread discussions across social media and other platforms. This engagement can be beneficial as it creates a buzz around the subject.

Take, for example, Nike's controversial ad campaign featuring Colin Kaepernick. While it drew significant criticism, it also resonated deeply with many consumers, driving discussion and ultimately increasing sales . The controversy kept the brand in the spotlight and aligned it with a significant social issue, strengthening its connection with a dedicated segment of its customer base.
3. Differentiation and Brand Positioning

Negative publicity can help differentiate a brand in a saturated market. By taking a bold or controversial stance, companies can set themselves apart from competitors who play it safe. This differentiation can attract a niche but loyal customer base that appreciates the brand's boldness.

Consider brands like Ryanair or PETA, which are known for their provocative and often controversial campaigns. These organizations use bad publicity strategically to reinforce their brand image and appeal to specific customer segments who share their values or appreciate their unconventional approaches .

4. Crisis as Opportunity

Bad publicity often forces organizations to confront and address underlying issues, leading to improvements and innovations. The scrutiny that comes with negative attention can act as a catalyst for change, prompting companies to improve their practices and policies.

For example, the Volkswagen emissions scandal led to significant changes within the company and the automotive industry at large. The negative publicity forced Volkswagen to invest heavily in electric vehicle technology, transforming its brand image and market offerings .

5. Resilience and Authenticity

How a brand or individual responds to bad publicity can demonstrate resilience and authenticity. By addressing criticism transparently and taking responsibility, organizations can build trust with their audience. This authentic response can sometimes turn critics into supporters and strengthen the loyalty of existing fans.

Johnson & Johnson's handling of the Tylenol crisis in the 1980s is a classic example. The company’s prompt and transparent response to the tampering incidents, including recalling products and introducing tamper-proof packaging, not only mitigated the immediate negative impact but also enhanced its reputation for consumer safety and integrity .

6. Long-Term Impact on Memory and Association

Negative events tend to be more memorable than positive ones due to their emotional impact. This can work in favor of maintaining a lasting impression in the minds of consumers. Studies in psychology have shown that people are more likely to remember negative information, which can lead to a longer-lasting association with the brand or individual involved .

Conclusion

While bad publicity poses immediate challenges, it also offers unique opportunities for growth and engagement. Increased visibility, stimulated discussion, brand differentiation, crisis-driven improvements, demonstrations of resilience, and long-lasting memory associations are all potential benefits of negative attention. The key lies in how the situation is managed—transforming bad publicity into an advantage requires strategic responses, transparency, and a willingness to learn and adapt.

Ultimately, in the fast-paced world of media and consumer attention, maintaining relevance is crucial, and bad publicity can be an unexpected yet powerful tool in achieving it.

Is ABS-CBN coming back to life?

Wazzup Pilipinas!?

ABS-CBN is keen on striking more partnerships to expand content reach in a bid to secure its financial future.

The "death" of ABS-CBN, a major Philippine media and entertainment company, refers to the non-renewal of its broadcast franchise, which led to the network ceasing its free-to-air television and radio operations. This significant event took place in 2020 and has had far-reaching implications for the Philippine media landscape.

ABS-CBN's franchise renewal became a contentious political issue. The company's 25-year congressional franchise expired on May 4, 2020. Despite filing for renewal years in advance, the House of Representatives' Committee on Legislative Franchises rejected ABS-CBN's application on July 10, 2020. The vote was 70-11 against the renewal, effectively shutting down the network's free-to-air broadcasting operations.

Several factors contributed to this outcome. The administration of President Rodrigo Duterte had publicly expressed opposition to the network. Duterte had accused ABS-CBN of unfair coverage and failure to air his political advertisements during the 2016 presidential campaign. These accusations, coupled with broader allegations of labor and tax violations, fueled the push against the network's franchise renewal.

The shutdown of ABS-CBN had immediate and profound effects. The network had been a dominant force in the Philippine media, known for its news coverage, entertainment programs, and public service initiatives. The cessation of its free-to-air broadcasts led to significant job losses, affecting thousands of employees. Additionally, it reduced the diversity of media voices and limited access to information for many Filipinos, particularly in remote areas where ABS-CBN's reach was crucial.

Despite the shutdown, ABS-CBN continued to operate through its digital platforms, cable channels, and partnerships with other broadcasters. The company has adapted by focusing on digital content and expanding its presence online. However, the loss of its franchise remains a significant blow to the network and a landmark event in the history of Philippine media.