The Pharmally and Michael Yang "Plundermic" issue grows bigger

Wazzup Pilipinas!?

Despite starting up P625,000, how did Pharmally Pharmaceuticals Corp. corner nearly P12 billion in contracts from the government for medical supplies to address the COVID-19 pandemic?

Who could have benefited in the P8.86-billion contract awarded to Pharmally Pharmaceutical Corp. by the government through the DBM-PS?

The bigger mystery in the Pharmally deal is who is behind Michael Yang? 

Palaki nang palaki ang cast of characters sa Pharmally issue. 

Is this the same Lin Weixiong or Allan Lim insinuated by anti-drug operator Eduardo Acierto as involved in the ILLEGAL DRUG TRADE? 

While everyone was in panic-mode in 2020 because of the wide-spread of covid19, proper procurement was skipped. No public bidding for these items and was just awarded to those selected companies at that time.

Pero matindi pala itong Pharmally. On the day they received a “Request for Quotation”, take note, “Request for Quotation” pa lang-  was the same day they “delivered the items” without a “purchase request/ order”.

The supplier of Pharmally is called “Brother Tiger”? Ano yan drug deal? Related ba yan kay Father Turtle? 

Ang gobyernong Duterte ay isang malaking cartel. Hiyang hiya ang mga cartel sa South America.

inside trading,

inside job,

ang kumita sila sila lang at pati sa gobyerno ni Duterte.

hohoho!!!

Prevailing price po and bid price, obviously maraming binili kaya mas mura

Why compare it to 3500? para "nakatipid" kuno. Dapat thankful pa tayo gorl?

Maraming kayang kayang labanan yung presyong yan, bakit hindi sila na-inform mag bid? Ahh kasi... NAKA SET UP NA. HAHAHA!

nakaplano na !!

pati eroplano naka ready na.

Tapos ibebenta ulit sa public hospitals, doble panalo? Ahahaha

Davao Pharmally group lang masaya. Two years pa lang yan na company.

Iba talaga pag malapit sa lutuan.

hohoho

hohoho! Sarap ng pasko nila talaga..tibang-tiba!

Most likely that Yang owns or make profits from these suppliers in China. Kung ako negosyante magpapalabas ba ako ng ganyan ka daming worth of goods ng walang downpayment or partial payment?

Why did they use military aircraft and navy ship to pick up goods from China to the Philippines? Para iwas customs duties and facilitate the delivery? Did they pay for the fuel of the aircraft and ship? How about per diems & allowances of persons involved? 

Did they file a customs declaration of those products? Were duties and taxes paid?

The use of taxpayer funded logistics is telling, why would they even bother with customs taxes?

Not only payment of fuel and crew. Vessel chartering costs millions per day once it leaves port of origin.

Pati ang warehouse na ginamit, sa gobierno rin daw! Grabe ang garapalan ng Duterte goernment. 

Kumurakot na nga, hindi pa nagbayad sa freight.. Nagpalibre pa!

Tustado tayo sa sarili nating mantika!

So if you add all the fuel, the salaries for the crew and other transport expenses to the base cost of the items imported - overall cost per piece was truly so much more than that of local manufacturer.

The question I have is what was the delivery contract between Pharmally and PS DBM? And contract between Pharmally and Chinese Supplier? Remember, Pharmally should have taken cared of all the transportation, duties, taxes and customs clearance processess, they being the supplier

Ano pa kaya ang kinarga kasabay ng med supplies na ayaw idaan sa customs? Your guess is as good as mine!

Binira nila si VP Leni last time nung naki-dala si VP Leni ng relief goods para sa mga nasalanta ng bagyo.. Nag-fake news pa si Panelo sumakay daw si VP Leni. Tapos ngayon private company ang gumamit ok lang. Sino ang nag inspect nung deliveries? Wala ba naisingit sa eroplano?

Or yung mga unregistered vaccines na Sinopharm at mga bakuna ng mga POGO workers. Wala makasagot sa PSG paano nakarating ang Sinopharm sa Pilipinas.

Sinasabi ni dyuterte na walang pagnanakaw diyan sa transaction sa Pharmally. Huwag tayong maniwala kasi madalas siya magsinungaling. Madalas din siya mag pretend.

Wala yan, buhol buhol na ang anomalya ipinagtatangol pa. Ang loyalty nila wala aa bayan ang loyalty nila ay nasa all mighty money.

Di ba sabi ni Duterte na pinapalamon niya ng pera ang mga generals ng militar at pulis? Kaya naging aso at mga robot niya ang mga ito at sinusunod lahat ng utos niya kahit labag sa batas?

Talagang what are they in power for ha? Grabe, sindikato talaga with the president as the Godfather. Binastos talaga ang Office of the President & our country. Bakit tayo dumating sa ganito?

Ang convenient alibi nila galvez et al palagi na lang "middle of a pandemic" na paulit ulit but the whole point is was it a valid reason to bypass virtually all the legalities? Kaya eto tayo ngayon lahat ng gawa nyo questionable, illegal and reeking of evil corruption.

Nalutto  ang bilihan @SenLeiladeLima 

Tapos tambak lang sa warehouse 

Tapos 2022 walang contact tracing  budget 

Run D5 for 2022 at maningil for us who lost loved ones this #plundermic. 

However everyone looks at it, be it politicking, electioneering, the fact remains. There was and a continuous plundemic, cover ups, which points to avarice, mishandling, incompetence, idiocy of this Administration

Once you really get a macro view on things, the once just seemingly suspicious events tie-in to others and you get that WTF realiziation in your head.

Grabe! Pandemic profiteers deserve a special island jail below sea level 23 hours / day.

Toni Gonzaga interviews BongBong Marcos, but glorifies his dictator father

Wazzup Pilipinas!?

Toni Talks? More like Toni Talks-ic!!! Has a platform and yet this is how she chooses to use it, to give space for people like BongBong Marcos (BBM) to take back their power. Disappointed at Toni, but not surprised at this point.  

When Toni opened her interview with BBM with “a man who needs no introduction”, I was like “of course, the man who couldnt get over losing even during this pandemic when we had more urgent problems”

I would like to think more likely that she just couldn't find a decent introduction for such a pathetic person. But the Gonzaga are allied with the Marcoses.

Shempre sinilip ko yung content ng video. It’s not even about the interviewee, but a glorification of the Dictator as a good father. Talaga nga namang revisionism and image-building ito, 

BBM says he wants the new generation to know that he is “the son of the longest lasting President who brought the Philippines into the modern world.”

Malamang naman sa 2 dekada dahil sa martial law eh talagang umabot na sa modern times ang Pilipinas.

Perang ipangpapakain ni Toni Gonzaga sa anak niya ang naging kapalit ay dugo ng mga pinatay ni Ferdinand Marcos! Yan ang dapat tandaan nila.

Toni has all the resources to educate herself about all the atrocities during the marcos regime, but she didn't bother

 Or she knows, she just doesn’t care.

I’m not very optimistic. It’s Duterte’s 6th year, di naman sya nag improve. She’s not the common Facebook citizen na limited ang access sa information at vulnerable sa fake news. Whatever she does, she does with full consciousnesses.

This isn't about her giving a platform for different political parties to be neutral, lol. Inviting BongBong Marcos to talk positively about his father is Toni Gonzaga actively participating in historical revisionism. Let's not pretend otherwise.

But I'd like to believe she still has the humanity in her so im leaning on the idea that maybe, she doesn't know, and that's what frustrates me.

To be fair, Toni has interviewed VP Leni also. So i think she is just being neutral. 

She also interviewed Isko, Moreno Grace Poe and for sure lahat ng tatakbo this coming 2022 Election mga tao nga naman watch first before you complain. Her being a celebrity has an.advantage. I'm sure these personalities wouldn't let themselves get interviewed by common people.

Maybe "neutral" as a "host" of her channel, just like what she did to all future candidates. 

But I know, no one should be neutral in terms of politics. We must make a STAND. and I choose to stand on the right and not to those people who brought suffering to a lot of Filipinos.

But giving a platform to someone like BBM, with the reach and influence she has, was a distasteful and quite insensitive choice - most especially in our current political climate.

Napaka insensitive talaga! Hindi pinag isipang mabuti. Actually, expected ko na yang galing sa pamilyang magnanakaw ang isusunod niya after VP Leni.

I won't classify this interview as neutral. If neutral talaga siya, she should have asked about the ill gotten wealth too. Hindi puro pang PR questions. That to me is one directional.

Convicted plunderer ang parents. they did not admit ‘yung corruption or tried to give back what they stole. Madami ding abused and murdered during Martial Law to which no comment lang sila.

Kung buhay ba si Hitler dapat din siyang bigyan ng platform? For the sake of being neutral?

It is not about respect anymore. His family are the once who plunged are country to debt and causes suffering to our people. His family enjoyed and is still enjoying the momey that is supposed to be for All Filipino. Giving him platform is not about respect. It's evil.

But just out of curiosity as to how his mind works, I'd like to see hitler interviewed. Lol!

I think ang problem is, Toni assumes that all people are smart enough to judge fairly based on facts and not on what they hear. Pero ang masa ay madaling maniwala sa fake news.

Pero not everyone possesses a critical  mind. Sadly. Sa culture natin, We were never really taught to ask the right questions and to seek the truth. Therefore, not exercising critical mindedness. Kaya majority just accepts everything at point blank.

The problem with Pinoys are they can easily forgive & forget which is a bad habit. So all the more we have to educate them for the suffering this family brought to us. And fight those trolls who are trying to revise history.

If you give a platform, even to someone that lies, someone that twist facts, then you are living the mantra of a journo? Was everything within the content fact-checked?  Cause if not, that is not true journalism. She has a chance to show only the truth through editing.

Sadly, that’s what journalism is, you can’t choose sides. However, you have to present all sides of a story.

Journalism should mean truth and justice. Not "both sides" when one side clearly lies and manipulates people. What is the other side to a brutal dictatorship that launched the Philippines into the state that it is today?

BBM's parents are convicted criminals. There's no other side to that. He enjoyed the money his parents plundered. He and Imee faked their credentials. What other sides you want to know? As if them doing all the good deeds can bring back the people killed in ML days?

When Toni interviewed VP Leni, it was clearly to position her so called "Neutrality" and cover her real political affiliation and close ties with the Marcoses.

C'mon. No Apolitical or Neutral person has a history of campaigning for BBM in his VP bid. 

What are inaanaks for? 

Always thought Toni’s interview with VP Leni was suspect, but I wasn’t so sure. 

Ginamit ni Toni si Leni. She used Leni so she can posture as someone neutral and objective, so that the vlog with Bongbong will appear to be anything other than propaganda.

Sige add fuel to historical revisionism pa. Hanggang magdusa ang lahat at ietsapuera lahat ng nag buwis buhay para sa ating demokrasya.

All the more that we have to be vigilant and make sure BBM will not get back to power. What I'm just trying to prove is, let us watch it but be critical and make sure to correct whatever attempts in trying to revise history. And call out Toni for her failure to fact check!

Kaso tamad at walang will power ang karamihan na mag fact check kaya wala tayong aasahan sa ganitong klaseng interviewer.

Anyone with a braincell can discern that what she did was malicious and a ploy to appear neutral when she is clearly not. 

Toni interviewed a lot of possible candidates so i understand why people think she's just being neutral. But Isko, Grace, and Leni or their parents were never proven guilty of graft and corruption. This is not Toni being neutral, she made us think she was by posting the other 3 first.

But we should not be quick to judge if it goes out our way or principles, she is just trying to present to us & later be the judge. We should also be open minded that life works that way. There shld be respect.

Just wanna say to those people who sucks BBM's dick and licks his ass, a wise philopher once said, sana bayad ka kasi mahirap na tanga ka lang for free. Also kung di ka bayad, at least side with the truth at least malinis konsensiya mo.

The ‘apolitical’ posturing isn’t sending a good message, knowing that most of her colleagues are stepping up to amplify the voices that must be heard. This is irresponsible. This is disappointing. This isn’t fairness, kung yun ang palagay niyang ginagawa niya.

I know I might get flak for speaking up about this, but I cannot, in good conscience, be silent about it. Because that means I’m endorsing the way she’s giving EVERYONE the platform even if some of them should be deplatformed in the first place. This isn’t it, Toni.

Sanay tayo na gumawa ng mga palabas na naniniwala sa kakayahan ng taong gumawa ng kabutihan. Pero kailangan din nating i-underline - hindi lahat ng tao, deserve ang entabladong ito. Kailangan din nating manindigan para sa mga taong napagkaitan ng bukas dahil sa mga taong ito.

Hindi ko talaga magets kung paano nasisikumaraan ni Toni Gonzaga, pati na rin ni Alex na maging neutral at this time and age. 

Kaya talaga si Bobbie yung favorite ko sa mga Salazar siblings eh: 

Why Toni? Why him? I think you used your platform inappropriately. Yung pamilyang yan ang nuno ng kurapsyon d2 sa Pinas. Bakit mo pinag-aksayahan ng panahon yan? Nakakagalit.

Syempre kapag malapit na eleksyon saka niya ilalabas yung interview kay Bong Go at Duterte, That’s the strategy. Check the pattern: Tugade- Villar (pati sa vlog ni alex nalabas)- Poe- Marcos. Di na talaga natuto tong si Toni G nakakaloka.

Magaling na strategy para di mawala sa limelight ang Videos niya. Malaki kita, di ba?

The worst and most distasteful part is that we will be commemorating one of the darkest days in Philippine history on the 21st. Ganda ng timing mo, Toni.

Toni Gonzaga should know the quote by a bishop:

“If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor. If an elephant has its foot on the tail of a mouse and you say that you are neutral, the mouse will not appreciate your neutrality”

Anong silbi ng pagiging Kristiyano mo ghorl, bukang bibig mo Jesus, God eme tapos you will side with an oppressor? a murderer?

Neutrality has no place right now. The Philippines is on the verge of collapse because of these kind of people. Toni should know better. This is not about being apolitical, we are talking about the future of our kids and that includes hers.

Pharmally is guilty of non-disclosure of having Michael Yang as guarantor, financier

Wazzup Pilipinas! 

The end does not justify the means. It matters less if all the goods were delivered, when the premise has dubious elements. 

The government should have the assurance that a supplier could deliver, and that could best be assured if the supplier has appropriate means like enough capital, and a credible reputation or track record, among many others, unlike Pharmally who only has above P500k as capital and is even wanted in Taiwan for financial crimes. 

These two factors are already enough to raisevthe eyebrows of anybody in pursuing the transaction. Every procurement specialist would tell the same thing.

If Pharmally would be loaning money from other sources, they should have disclosed at the very start that they have Michael Yang providing the financial assistance and acting as guarantor.

Non-disclosure means they are possibly hiding something. This also tells us that Michael Yang's close connection with the government gave him the advantage in landing the billion- worth contract...and Pharmally most probably just acted as a dummy company, for Yang is possibly the one who benefitted and earned more from the deal.

Yang obviously got favored, and the government did not source other suppliers for better offers. He may have been the former economic adviser, but that should not give him special arrangement bypassing the necessary process and requirements. An adviser does not have the final say, but only gives recomendations.

The pandemic is not a qualified reason for the government to ignore the red flags indicating  Pharmally is not a credible supplier. There may be the need to immediately act in order to effectively counter the effects of this virus, but the government should have confined their options among the credible suppliers only.