BREAKING

Friday, May 29, 2020

What Are The Chances of Success of IVF in The First Attempt?

Wazzup Pilipinas!

When a patient plans to undergo an IVF treatment procedure, he or she should be sure of one thing; that there is nothing fixed for an IVF treatment.

You have to mould yourself as per the
situations, and the response of your body towards the treatment.

You shall end your expectations and improve your patience when you are preparing for an IVF procedure.

It is not that you cannot conceive in the first round of IVF cycle, but it is equally valid that the first cycle may fail.
So, never think about:

● The number of IVF cycles, and
● IVF Procedure Cost.

It is because the cost automatically increases, with the number of cycles. Thinking more about such things can only create stress which is not at all advisable during IVF treatment.

Relation in the First IVF Cycle and Result:
Different researches and data show different conclusions for IVF treatment.

Some reveal that the success of IVF is higher after the five cycles. While some others say, you get the results within the first three cycles.

Some reports connect the data of achieving results within the first IVF cycle with age. It says:

● Over 70% of the couple who undergo the IVF treatment before the age of 35 years
avail the success in the first cycle
● Now, couples who proceed with the treatment between the age of 35 to 40 years have
40% chances to get the results in the first IVF cycle
● For those who delay in the treatment, and plan for it after the age of 40 years, have
only 25% of chances to receive the good news by the end of the first cycle.

Well, there is no denying the fact that there is a significant relation between IVF treatment results and the age of the couple.

At the same time, we cannot say that only age is the factor that determines the success of the treatment. Several other factors need to be considered for the treatment results.

Some of the most common reasons that alter the results of an IVF treatment includes:

● The cause of infertility in the couple
● Who is sterile, the male or the female partner
● Experience of the doctor in dealing with the condition of the patient
● Procedure planned for the treatment
● Proper analysis of the condition of the patient, and deciding on the treatment plan
accordingly

So, we can say there is no guarantee to get the results in the first cycle. The assurance can only be of getting the results.

You might avail the results in the very first attempt or might go for multiple cycles with the heartbreaking outcome every time.

You need to be strong to accept the result, and further proceed with the treatment.

In a Nutshell:
You can get a recommendation of IVF from the doctor, and he can also make an IVF 
Treatment Package for the first cycle, but he can never guarantee the number of cycles.

No doctor or surgeon, irrespective of their experience and expertise can answer the same. So, live with the fact before you decide to undergo an IVF treatment.

We Need Our Domestic Fisheries More Than.Ever



Wazzup Pilipinas!

In the face of international lockdowns, we need our domestic fisheries more than ever before

By WWF-Philippines Sustainable Tuna Partnerships Project Manager Joann Binondo

Our fisheries play a vital role to the physical and economic health of our country. The Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources reported that for the year 2018, the sector contributed P214.869 billion to the economy and provided employment and livelihood for 1.8 million Filipinos. The average
Filipino derives 22.5% of their annual food intake from fishery products - a quarter of their yearly diet.

At the same time, however, we’re seeing a drop in local production, with the first quarter of 2020 posting a 3.2% drop in productivity compared to the first quarter of 2019.




Our reliance on our fisheries demands that we take care of them and that we keep them productive – but the COVID-19 pandemic threatens to leave the sector in deep water.

For a long time, our fisheries have been heavily dependent on exports. Markets across the region, in Europe, and in the United States have been major destinations for our exports. Throughout 2018 we
exported a total of 464,248 metric tons of seafood with a total value of approximately 83 billion pesos, according to BFAR data. With the ongoing pandemic, however, high-value, international markets are
starting to turn inwards, realizing that their reliance on traded fish isn’t wise given current events.

We are also a country of imports. Data from BFAR shows that throughout 2018 alone, we imported 515,905 metric tons of seafood worth 373,356,000 pesos in total. As international trade slows, so too
will these imports, depriving our countrymen of resources they have grown accustomed to, even dependent on, over the many years of robust international trade.
With international markets becoming increasingly closed off, this poses a problem for the “New Normal” – dry markets and poorer fishers. As the markets dry up, fishers fish more to make up for
their losses in the cheaper, local scene, putting our marine resources further at risk.

We need to plug the growing holes in our local seafood supply chain. If we do not, then we risk further damage to the economy and to the sector, and many Filipinos risk decreases in what is a major part of their diet. This is why we need to build our domestic markets, and why we need to support sustainable fishing.
The development of our domestic markets is a journey that must be done sustainably.

Our country is already plagued with the effects of destructive, unsustainable industry. Dwindling fishery productivity
is an indicator of this. The various damaged and destroyed fisheries throughout the country are damning evidence. If we don’t handle our fisheries with care, future generations will carry the burden
of the damage we cause today.

There are three stages we must look at in order to build sustainable, productive domestic markets for our fisheries:

Firstly, we must protect our fisheries. Our coastal waters are the source of much of our fish resources, but mismanagement and unsustainable extraction have left many of them damaged. The fisheries
themselves underpin the entire industry, and their loss would spell disaster for millions. Through effective tracing and monitoring of fishing activities, and with just and sufficient enforcement of fishery
law to crack down on illegal activities, we can keep our oceans vibrant.

Secondly, we need to build and support the livelihoods of our local fishermen. Many unsustainable fishery activities find their roots in a lack of livelihood security. A solution to low income, for example, is to harvest more fish, which can be harmful to the ecosystem in the long run. By expanding their incomes and livelihoods, we can keep fishers from causing damage to marine resources. We can do this by extending social protection measures to them and giving them access to technology that helps them reap the most benefit from their catches. We can also streamline the fisheries supply chain and make it preferential to our fishermen, so they are able to earn more off of each catch. We must put our local fishermen first and develop them into competitive providers to the Philippine economy.

And finally, we need to make sure that we, as consumers, are choosing Filipino fish. All the sustainability measures and livelihood development in the world will not mean anything if we don’t put our purchasing money into our fisheries. We must be willing, as well, to pay a premium for quality, sustainable fishery products, to keep our markets rich and to mitigate the risk of overfishing. In choosing local, sustainable fish, we can breathe life anew into this most important pillar of our economy.

What’ll it take to build our domestic markets? Consumers, of course, need to choose locally-sourced fish, and fishers themselves, and those in the industry, need to adhere to fishery law and the principles of sustainable fishing. Most importantly, though, businesses and government agencies must provide the landscape to allow our fisheries to thrive. Only with everyone’s support can we breathe new life into our fisheries.

The COVID-19 pandemic has presented us with challenges unlike anything modern-day Philippines has faced before. Our export-dependent fisheries risk losing millions of pesos, leaving an already-poor sector in dire straits. Meanwhile, our import-dependent markets risk large-scale decline, putting a strain on the resources that come into our country. Filipino diets are dependent on fish. Thus we are presented with a problem - but in this problem, there is opportunity.
If we turn towards local fisheries, we can cut back on our reliance on imports without suffering over our reliance of fish. If we choose to pay a premium for locally-sourced and sustainable fish, we can keep the sector vibrant even with less exportation. We can fill the growing gaps in our fisheries with our very own catches, at the benefit of our markets and the fishers themselves. We can learn to be self-reliant. We can bring ourselves back to prosperity.

Besides, why shouldn't we buy local fish? What's happening now is that we're getting low-quality fish, the catch that doesn't meet international food safety standards - the rejects of high quality markets.

Is that what we deserve? Are we even going to accept that local fish be called "rejects," and not the best of the best? Don't we deserve export-quality fish at local prices, the best that our countrymen can offer, bought for the benefit of our very own fishers? We ought to be the ones to enjoy the bounties of our seas.

Is NCR Ready for GCQ Even If We Have Not Flatten the Curve?

Wazzup Pilipinas!

“NCR is ready (based) from the data we’ve seen but that really depends on the cooperation of everyone,” Roque said.

Manipulated data is what you are looking. The same data that is manipulated by the head of DOH, appointed and influenced by your president. Do not pass the burden of being an experiment to the citizens by this reckless decision.

LOL wait for 2 weeks then number of cases will triple. Our hospitals are barely holding on with the number of cases we have already.

Inaccurate numbers of positive cases considering DOH has a 7k backlog, and yet ready na kmi sa MMCQ (Matira Matibay Community Quarantine).

Wala pang 100 cases dati  nag ECQ tayo sobrang higpit nun,, ngaung 15k na cases GCQ na haha ,, baligtad ata mas maluwag kung kelan mas marami kaso ...

Dapat PA-Q na lang itawag nyo!

We're not like the US or any other first world country. Our hospitals cannot handle that much amount of cases.

Loyola, Manila North and south, la loma cemeteries will have booming businesses... Let's just wish that they have enough lot for all of us and marble supply for tombstones. WE ARE DOOMED.

We just had 350 cases yesterday, 539 new cases today. The curve is not flattening but instead inflating. How can we be ready for GCQ? Most especially that covid positive undocumented POGO workers are still roaming around, not quarantined and not really monitored. With mass testing not in full blast, new cases might further increase. God help us.

We are definitely not flattening the curve. Well our economy is hurting but the most we could do is to have aggressive mass testing and contact tracing. sana naman maimplement ng maayos..kasi kawawa lahat if lumobo pa ang cases.. especially our healthworkers and non-medical frontliners.

The problem is our government cannot sustain feeding everybody without income and our food supply is running low.

The Quarantine Period was really designed to orient and train everyone on how to deal with the virus, the Do's and Don'ts because in reality we cannot afford not to open up our economy it will be more fatal for all of us.

"But that really depends on the cooperation of everyone"

hahahaha low-key blaming kapag mas  lumobo cases.

Yung sasabihin na "Depends On The Cooperation Of Everyone"... Para mag hanap ng masisisi... Kapag pumalpak sila ay yung mga tao may kasalanan kasi walang disiplina... Tinanggap ba nila pagkakamali nila na hindi agad sila nag deklara ng Travel Ban???... Mga pangkaraniaang tao agad ang sinisi nila at sinabihang mga walang disiplina...

In the end, para sakanila walang kasalanan ang gobyerno. Kumbaga, bahala kayo sa mga buhay niyo. Hahahaha! Kawawang Pilipinas.

Hayyyy anung silbi nyan GCQ kung walang public transpo. Papasok ng trabaho 3km lkakaran sa umaga pati pag-uwi. May motor kami di naman pwede angkas kasi sabi ng gobyerno bawal. Yun lang transpo sana safe sa amin Pamilya if ever kung mgkapublic transpo. Or di kaya payagan ninyo tricycle sa main road or makapasok sa ibang city kasi tricycle lang pwede.

Why not tell the truth,.its not safe out there, but we need to do it for the economy,..bakit ba hindi maging totoo huh Roque?

Truth? haha...they would miss the chance of getting the incentives... if they will utter genuine stuff. Honesty is very rare for a politician.

NCR is not yet ready for GCQ because confirmed cases are getting higher lalo pang tataas yan tapos under ECQ na naman after 15 days.

There are now studies and data that says lockdowns have made the spread of the virus worst. 66% of infections happened indoors. Dapat tapusin na yan mga GCQ at ECQ. The number of infected are not dropping. In thousands of years this is the only time that human beings lost their immune system to fight off the virus.

Remember the covid specialists China “so graciously sent over to help” us? Siguro may dalang vaccines yun (via diplomatic immunity) at yan ang gamit nila sa unlicensed Chinese hospitals. so far 2 palang; there’s more na hindi pa natiktikan.

This despite the spiking in the number of new cases!

NCR is a seamless community. Containing the wide spreading is a tall order under the MECQ!

How much more kapag nag GCQ! God forbids!

Wala na pera kaya wala na pang-ayuda kaya kailangan nyo ng kumita. Hehe pero stay safe at your own. Good luck to everybody.
Ang Pambansang Blog ng Pilipinas Wazzup Pilipinas and the Umalohokans. Ang Pambansang Blog ng Pilipinas celebrating 10th year of online presence
 
Copyright © 2013 Wazzup Pilipinas News and Events
Design by FBTemplates | BTT