Escape or Conspiracy? The Mystery Behind Harry Roque’s Alleged Flight Sparks Government Probe

Wazzup Pilipinas!?

The Bureau of Immigration (BI) and the National Intelligence Coordinating Agency (NICA) have found themselves in hot water after Senator Risa Hontiveros questioned them about the whereabouts of former presidential spokesperson Atty. Harry Roque.

The controversy erupted amid allegations that Roque illegally left the country despite his reported involvement in cases related to the Philippine Offshore Gaming Operations (POGO). With the spotlight now on government agencies responsible for monitoring border security, this case raises serious concerns about how high-profile figures can allegedly slip through immigration controls unnoticed.

Senator Hontiveros Calls for Answers

In a fiery statement, Senator Hontiveros pressed the BI and other law enforcement agencies to explain how Roque was able to leave the Philippines without any official records. She emphasized that Dubai—where Roque is believed to be—has long been a known hub for POGO operations, making it plausible that certain POGO actors facilitated his alleged escape.

Hontiveros also slammed the BI for its apparent failure to track Roque’s movements, pointing out the double standard in immigration procedures. "Ordinary Filipinos go through strict screening when leaving the country, but fugitives seem to have an easier time slipping away," she remarked. 

Roque Fires Back: ‘No Hold Departure Order, No Escape’

Roque was quick to defend himself against the allegations, denying that he fled the country. In his response, he clarified that no hold departure order (HDO) was issued against him, meaning he had every legal right to travel.

He also strongly denied any involvement with POGO-related activities, calling the claims against him “irresponsible and malicious.” Roque challenged Senator Hontiveros to present solid evidence outside of the Senate, where she does not have parliamentary immunity. 

Bureau of Immigration Under Scrutiny

Despite Roque’s denial, the Bureau of Immigration admitted that there were no official departure records of Roque leaving the country. The last recorded travel activity under his name was his return from Los Angeles in July.

This has led authorities to suspect that Roque may have left the country illegally, possibly with the assistance of corrupt insiders. The BI has since launched an investigation and is considering filing falsification of public documents charges against him.

Government Moves to Track Roque’s Whereabouts

The Philippine Embassy in Abu Dhabi has been contacted for additional information regarding Roque’s alleged presence in Dubai. Meanwhile, the government continues its probe to identify potential accomplices who may have assisted him in leaving the country undetected. (Source: Radyo Pilipinas)

Final Thoughts: A Scandal That Exposes Systemic Loopholes

The case of Harry Roque has once again exposed potential vulnerabilities in the Philippine immigration system. If a high-profile figure can allegedly leave the country without a trace, what does this mean for national security and law enforcement?

With investigations underway, one thing is certain—this scandal is far from over. Will Roque be cleared of all allegations, or will more revelations come to light? The coming weeks may hold the answers.

Philippines Strikes Back: Bold New Map Challenges China’s Claims in South China Sea!

Wazzup Pilipinas!?

Hello, China. We have map-making skills, too. 

#FilipinasDelNorte #PhilippineProvince

The phrase "Hello, China. We have map-making skills, too. #FilipinasDelNorte #PhilippineProvince" encapsulates the Philippines' assertion of its cartographic capabilities and territorial claims, particularly in the context of ongoing disputes in the South China Sea. This statement reflects a broader narrative intertwining historical cartography, national sovereignty, and geopolitical tensions.

Historical Cartography and Territorial Claims

Central to the Philippines' assertion is the Carta Hydrographica y Chorographica de las Islas Filipinas, commonly known as the Murillo Velarde map. Published in 1734 by Jesuit cartographer Pedro Murillo Velarde, this map is often referred to as the "Mother of all Philippine Maps." It meticulously details the Philippine archipelago, including features like "Panacot," believed by many Filipino scholars to represent the Scarborough Shoal. This map has been instrumental in the Philippines' efforts to assert territorial rights in the South China Sea, especially during international legal proceedings. 

In 2016, the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague ruled in favor of the Philippines, stating that China had "no historical rights" based on their nine-dash line map. China, however, rejected the ruling. 

Recent Developments in the South China Sea Dispute

The South China Sea remains a hotspot for territorial disputes, with both China and the Philippines asserting claims over various features. In December 2024, China released geographical coordinates marking its claims over Scarborough Shoal, two days after the Philippines enacted twin laws reaffirming its maritime territories and rights in the South China Sea. 

In January 2025, both nations agreed to seek common ground and enhance cooperation despite ongoing disputes. During the 10th round of bilateral consultations, they committed to advancing coast guard and marine scientific collaboration and resolving conflicts peacefully. 

Espionage Concerns and Maritime Security

Tensions have also been exacerbated by incidents of alleged espionage. In February 2025, five Chinese nationals were arrested in the Philippines for allegedly spying on the Philippine navy near the South China Sea. The accused were said to be involved with Chinese Communist Party-affiliated groups that donated cash and vehicles to local entities, raising concerns about foreign influence and national security. 

Cultural Assertion through Social Media

The hashtags #FilipinasDelNorte and #PhilippineProvince in the original statement symbolize a cultural and nationalistic assertion of territorial claims. By emphasizing "FilipinasDelNorte," there is an implicit assertion of sovereignty over northern territories, possibly referencing areas like the Scarborough Shoal. Such social media expressions reflect the sentiments of Filipinos advocating for their country's territorial integrity.

Conclusion

The interplay between historical cartography and modern geopolitical strategies underscores the Philippines' efforts to assert its territorial claims. Through the utilization of historical maps like the Murillo Velarde map and contemporary diplomatic engagements, the Philippines continues to navigate the complex dynamics of the South China Sea disputes.

China’s Latest Land Grab? Social Media Now Claims Palawan Belongs to Beijing!

Wazzup Pilipinas!?

In recent weeks, Chinese social media platforms have been abuzz with claims that Palawan, a province of the Philippines, historically belongs to China. These assertions, propagated by Chinese netizens, suggest that Palawan was once known as "Zheng He Island," named after the famed 15th-century Chinese admiral who led naval expeditions across Asia and Africa. 

The Philippine government has swiftly and categorically dismissed these claims. Rear Admiral Roy Vincent Trinidad, the Philippine Navy's spokesperson on the West Philippine Sea, labeled the assertions as "baseless" and "totally absurd." He emphasized that Palawan has always been an integral part of Philippine territory, and such unfounded narratives are attempts to distort historical facts. 

This incident is not isolated but is part of a broader pattern of disinformation and territorial assertions by Chinese nationalists. Similar tactics have been observed in other territorial disputes, where social media campaigns are used to sway public opinion and legitimize expansionist claims. The spread of such narratives on platforms like Douyin (China's version of TikTok) raises concerns about the role of state influence in shaping public discourse, especially given the stringent controls over information within China. 

The timing of these claims coincides with heightened tensions in the South China Sea region. On March 5, 2025, a Philippine civilian boat delivering supplies to the BRP Sierra Madre—a Philippine Navy ship grounded on the contested Second Thomas Shoal—was monitored by the Chinese coast guard. While the resupply mission proceeded without incident, it underscores the fragile status quo and the potential for escalation in these disputed waters. 

In response to China's increasing assertiveness, Philippine Defense Secretary Gilberto Teodoro Jr. issued a stern warning. He stated that any attempt by China to impose an air defense identification zone or restrict flights over the South China Sea would be met with resistance from the Philippines and its allies. Teodoro emphasized that such actions threaten both national and global security, given the strategic importance of these maritime routes. 

The international community has also taken note of these developments. The 2016 ruling by the Permanent Court of Arbitration invalidated China's expansive claims in the South China Sea, a decision China continues to reject. The recent social media assertions about Palawan further complicate the already tense dynamics in the region, prompting calls for vigilance against disinformation campaigns that seek to alter historical and legal realities.

In conclusion, the unfounded claims circulating on Chinese social media regarding Palawan are part of a broader strategy to challenge established territorial boundaries. The Philippines remains steadfast in asserting its sovereignty, backed by international law and historical evidence. As the situation unfolds, it serves as a reminder of the critical need for accurate information and the dangers posed by state-sponsored disinformation in shaping geopolitical narratives.