Wazzup Pilipinas!?
As the 2025 elections approach, Filipinos face a critical decision about who will sit in the Senate. Each vote counts, and it is essential to thoroughly evaluate the candidates and their qualifications—or lack thereof. The choices we make now will impact the future of the country. Let’s take a closer look at the candidates and the realities surrounding their potential return to the Senate.
Candidates to Think Twice About
The Tulfo Family: While Erwin Tulfo leads in the surveys for Senate, there are concerns about the rise of another political dynasty. We need to evaluate whether a political family that already holds power is what the country truly needs. Are their platforms aligned with the nation's progress, or will their influence just perpetuate dynastic politics?
The Binay and Cayetano Dynasties: The idea of having multiple members from the same family in the Senate raises questions about concentration of power. Is this healthy for our democracy, or does it limit the opportunity for new, diverse voices? It’s crucial to consider whether their political legacies are truly beneficial for the country.
Tito Sotto: Former Senate President Tito Sotto has had a long career in the Senate. While his experience is undeniable, there are concerns that his views may be outdated and no longer in sync with modern issues. The question remains: does his experience translate into effective legislation, or has he become disconnected from the current needs of the people?
Bong Go and Bato Dela Rosa: Both members of the ruling political party, PDP-Laban, are once again vying for Senate seats. However, there are criticisms that their previous terms have not yielded substantial results. The question arises: do they have the track record to justify a second term, or have they failed to deliver on their promises?
Bong Revilla: Known for his controversial history and the ongoing allegations of corruption, Senator Bong Revilla has yet to fully prove his worth to the Filipino people. His questionable track record and scandals raise doubts about his suitability for public office. What has he contributed to the Senate other than a few viral moments?
Manny Pacquiao: A boxing legend, Pacquiao’s track record in the Senate has been under scrutiny. His decisions often seem influenced by his religious beliefs, but the question is: should national policy be based on religious principles? With the country’s secular state in mind, voters must assess whether Pacquiao's platform truly aligns with the needs of the nation.
Willie Revillame: His recent statement that he would figure out his plans for the Filipino people only after being elected is deeply concerning. For someone who aims to serve in the Senate, this lack of foresight and clear vision raises serious doubts about his leadership abilities. Should we really vote for someone who has no solid plan for governance?
Lito Lapid: Senator Lito Lapid has been serving in the Senate for many years, but his actual contributions to legislation have been limited. His recent record raises questions about whether he has been an active and effective senator or just a figurehead. Does he truly have the vision and work ethic needed to serve the Filipino people, or is he just collecting a paycheck?
Ping Lacson: Although Ping Lacson has built a reputation for his stance on corruption, his principles have sometimes appeared inconsistent. He is often seen as a politician who shifts his position depending on the situation, leading many to question his true political ideology. It is crucial to consider whether Lacson offers the kind of leadership we need or if there are more qualified candidates who can bring clarity and stability.
Apollo Quiboloy: The controversial pastor Apollo Quiboloy has registered as a Senate candidate despite facing serious criminal charges, including sexual abuse and human trafficking. His candidacy is being met with resistance from rights groups, and his potential to influence legislation raises concerns. His past should be scrutinized to determine if he is fit to serve in public office.
Kiko Pangilinan: On the other hand, Senator Kiko Pangilinan stands out for his consistent dedication to public service. He is the author or co-author of 150 laws, including significant ones like the Sagip Saka Act, Coconut Farmers and Industry Trust Fund Act, and the Universal Access to Quality Tertiary Education Act. Pangilinan's solid track record of legislation proves his commitment to advancing the welfare of Filipinos. He is a candidate who has not only talked the talk but also walked the walk.
A Final Reminder: Make Your Vote Count
We still have time to think and vote wisely. Take the time to research, observe, and study who the most deserving candidates are. Wasting your vote on candidates who lack knowledge or meaningful contributions to society is a disservice to the nation. Remember, at the end of the day, it is the people who will pay the salaries of our elected officials. We need leaders who are committed to making a difference, not just fulfilling a political agenda.
Let’s choose the right people for the Senate, those who will serve with integrity, vision, and dedication. It’s time to end the cycle of political dynasties and elect leaders who will prioritize the welfare of the Filipino people over their personal interests. Don’t let this election pass without considering the future you want for the Philippines.