Supreme Court Shocker: No TRO for Duterte and Bato – What Happens Next?

Wazzup Pilipinas!?

In a significant legal development, the Supreme Court of the Philippines has declined to issue a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) in response to a petition filed by former President Rodrigo Duterte and Senator Ronald "Bato" Dela Rosa. The petition sought to prevent the Philippine government's cooperation with the International Criminal Court (ICC) and to secure Duterte's immediate release following his arrest on charges of crimes against humanity. 

Background of the Petition

On March 11, 2025, Duterte and Dela Rosa submitted a 94-page petition for certiorari and prohibition to the Supreme Court. The petition aimed to bar Philippine authorities from assisting the ICC in its investigation into the controversial anti-drug campaign initiated during Duterte's presidency. Specifically, it sought to prevent officials from allowing ICC personnel to enter the country, facilitating their activities, or cooperating in any form with the ICC's proceedings. 

The petitioners argued that the ICC lacked jurisdiction over the Philippines, citing the country's withdrawal from the Rome Statute on March 17, 2019. They contended that since no formal judicial proceedings were authorized before the withdrawal, the ICC's continued investigation was illegal and constituted a violation of the nation's sovereignty. 

Supreme Court's Response

Upon receiving the petition, the Supreme Court conducted a special raffle to assign the case to a member-in-charge, as per its internal procedures. Despite the urgency conveyed by Duterte's legal team, the Court did not issue a TRO. Consequently, Duterte was transported to The Hague, Netherlands, where the ICC is headquartered, shortly after 11 p.m. on the same day. 

Reactions and Implications

The Supreme Court's decision not to grant a TRO has significant implications for the Philippines' legal and political landscape. It underscores the judiciary's stance on the country's obligations under international law, even after its withdrawal from the Rome Statute. Legal experts note that the Court's refusal to issue a TRO may set a precedent for future cases involving international legal bodies and the extent of their reach within Philippine jurisdiction. 

Supporters of Duterte and Dela Rosa have expressed concerns over the decision, arguing that it compromises national sovereignty. Conversely, human rights advocates view the development as a step toward accountability for alleged abuses committed during the anti-drug campaign, which reportedly resulted in thousands of deaths. 

Conclusion

The Supreme Court's refusal to issue a TRO in favor of former President Duterte and Senator Dela Rosa marks a pivotal moment in the Philippines' engagement with international legal mechanisms. As the situation unfolds, it will be crucial to monitor how this decision influences the country's legal obligations and its relationship with international institutions like the ICC.

About "WazzupPilipinas.com"

WazzupPilipinas.com is the fastest growing and most awarded blog and social media community that has transcended beyond online media. It has successfully collaborated with all forms of media namely print, radio and television making it the most diverse multimedia organization. The numerous collaborations with hundreds of brands and organizations as online media partner and brand ambassador makes WazzupPilipinas.com a truly successful advocate of everything about the Philippines, and even more since its support extends further to even international organizations including startups and SMEs that have made our country their second home.