Paolo Duterte Rushes to Netherlands After Father's Arrest by ICC!

Wazzup Pilipinas!?

In a significant development, the Philippine House of Representatives has granted Davao City 1st District Representative Paolo "Pulong" Duterte permission to travel to the Netherlands and Japan from March 12 to April 15, 2025. This approval comes in the wake of the arrest of his father, former President Rodrigo Duterte, by the International Criminal Court (ICC) on charges of crimes against humanity linked to his controversial war on drugs.

House Approval of Paolo Duterte's Travel

House Secretary General Reginald Velasco confirmed that Representative Paolo Duterte's request for a travel authority was approved. In his letter to House Speaker Ferdinand Martin Romualdez, dated March 11, 2025, Duterte outlined his plans to visit the Netherlands and Japan during the specified period. He emphasized that all expenses for this trip would be covered by his personal funds.

Arrest of Former President Rodrigo Duterte

Former President Rodrigo Duterte was arrested at Manila's international airport on March 11, 2025, upon his arrival from Hong Kong. The arrest was executed based on an ICC warrant alleging crimes against humanity related to the thousands of deaths during his administration's anti-drug operations. Duterte was subsequently flown to The Hague to face trial. 

Reactions and Legal Proceedings

The arrest has elicited mixed reactions. Families of the drug war victims expressed relief and hope for justice. Randy delos Santos, whose nephew was killed in a 2017 police operation, remarked, "This is a big, long-awaited day for justice." 

Conversely, Duterte's legal team has challenged the arrest. His youngest daughter, Veronica, filed a petition to the Philippine Supreme Court accusing the government of "kidnapping" and demanding his return. Supporters argue that the ICC lacks jurisdiction, citing the Philippines' withdrawal from the Rome Statute in 2019. 

Government's Stance on ICC Jurisdiction

Prior to the arrest, President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. had asserted that the Philippines would not recognize any ICC arrest warrant against Duterte, emphasizing the country's sovereignty and functional judicial system. 

Similarly, the Philippine National Police had stated they would not enforce any ICC warrants, aligning with the government's position on the court's jurisdiction. 

Implications for the Philippines

The arrest of a former president by an international body is unprecedented in Philippine history and has significant implications for the nation's political and legal landscape. It underscores the ongoing debate about accountability, sovereignty, and the role of international institutions in domestic affairs. As events unfold, the Philippines finds itself at a crossroads, grappling with its commitment to justice and the complexities of international law.