Wazzup Pilipinas!?
Krizette Chu, the DDS social media personality who recently stood before the Tricomm hearing to apologize for spreading fake news, seems to be at it again—peddling yet another round of deception. But this time, we won’t just call it out—we’ll dismantle her latest statement piece by piece. We still need to verify if this is indeed her or somebody else taking her identity.
"THE FILIPINO DIASPORA VS THE MARCOS ROMUALDEZ ADMIN
The Marcos Romualdez administration expected a revolution on the streets when Duterte was kidnapped. That’s why EDSA and other areas they expected supporters to congregate have been secured, even when Sara was impeached.
What they didn’t expect was a worldwide protest—one whose narrative they can’t twist; one with people they can’t pay off to be silent; one that is borderless, from the streets of New York to the internet, which they couldn’t control.
One so big and so loud there is nothing they can do to quiet the maelstrom on the streets.
They can scare Filipinos in the country but they cannot touch the OFWs who loved PRRD and who loved them in return.
I bet they did not foresee how their name will be dragged not just in the Philippines but all over the world— the petty son of a dictator who betrayed his own ally, egged on by an ambitious ruthless cousin who because he could not be loved, tried to run a government based on fear.
But the dam has been broken, and people all over the Philippines and all over the world are fighting for Rodrigo Duterte and for Filipino sovereignty.
And the Filipino diaspora—one of the biggest and most important in the world—is to thank for this.
Finally, non Pinoys and foreign governments are starting to notice. 11 days after Rodrigo Duterte was forced into an airplane, the world is sitting up and taking notice.
This is just the beginning. Once an idea is let loose into the world, you can label it anything you want, but it’s already taken shape."
In the fast-paced digital age, narratives can be manufactured, amplified, and distorted beyond recognition. The claim that the Marcos-Romualdez administration is facing an unstoppable, worldwide uprising from the Filipino diaspora over the supposed “kidnapping” of former President Rodrigo Duterte is not only exaggerated but also misleading.
Let’s dismantle the fiction and ground ourselves in the facts.
1. Duterte Was Not “Kidnapped” – He Was Subject to Due Process
The core of this narrative hinges on the false assertion that Rodrigo Duterte was “forced into an airplane” against his will. However, there is no credible evidence to support this claim. The former president, despite facing multiple legal and human rights inquiries during his tenure and beyond, has not been secretly whisked away or detained unlawfully.
If such an extraordinary event had actually taken place, where are the official reports from independent sources? Where is the footage? Where are the legal proceedings confirming this "kidnapping"? Without concrete evidence, this claim remains nothing more than a sensationalized piece of fiction designed to incite fear and outrage.
2. The Marcos-Romualdez Administration Did Not Fear a “Revolution”
The idea that the administration was bracing for an uprising on the streets following Duterte’s alleged disappearance is unfounded. While protests and demonstrations are natural in any democratic society, there has been no large-scale, nationwide revolt that even comes close to the EDSA People Power Revolution of 1986.
Yes, there have been scattered protests both online and offline, but these are a far cry from the mass mobilization that some groups have attempted to portray. The notion that the government was “securing EDSA” in anticipation of an uprising is speculative at best and manipulative at worst.
3. The Filipino Diaspora Is Not a Monolith—Nor Is It a Political Weapon
The claim that Overseas Filipino Workers (OFWs) and the global Filipino community are uniformly against the Marcos-Romualdez administration is a gross oversimplification. The Filipino diaspora is incredibly diverse, encompassing a wide range of political beliefs, economic interests, and personal values.
Yes, many OFWs supported Duterte due to his pro-OFW policies and strongman persona, but does this mean every Filipino abroad is now actively fighting against the current administration? Absolutely not.
Furthermore, OFWs have always been concerned about economic security, fair labor rights, and support from the Philippine government. Their priorities do not revolve solely around one political figure. The idea that they have become the sole driving force of an international anti-Marcos movement is a misrepresentation of their collective will.
4. The “Worldwide Protest” is Overstated and Largely Digital
Social media can create the illusion of widespread upheaval, but trending hashtags do not equate to real-world revolutions. While pockets of protests may have occurred in select cities abroad, these are far from a coordinated, large-scale international movement that could genuinely threaten the administration.
Moreover, many of the so-called “global protests” appear to be orchestrated by politically motivated factions rather than an organic uprising. There is no substantial evidence of foreign governments formally intervening in the Philippine political landscape due to alleged human rights concerns over Duterte's situation.
5. The Marcos-Romualdez Administration Is Not "Running on Fear"
Another baseless claim is that President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. and House Speaker Martin Romualdez are governing through fear. If this were true, we would see widespread human rights violations, crackdowns on free speech, and mass arrests of dissenters. However, critics continue to voice their opinions openly, media outlets still operate, and the political opposition remains active.
Duterte himself was known for his own brand of governance that often relied on strong rhetoric and fear tactics, particularly in the war on drugs. To accuse the current administration of being more authoritarian than Duterte’s presidency is ironic at best and hypocritical at worst.
6. The “Ambitious Ruthless Cousin” Narrative is Pure Speculation
The claim that Martin Romualdez is the puppet master orchestrating Duterte’s downfall out of personal ambition is a classic case of political fan fiction. There is no concrete evidence that Romualdez is masterminding a grand betrayal.
Yes, political rivalries exist within the Philippine government, but Duterte’s declining influence is not because of a singular villain in the Marcos administration—it is a natural progression of political dynamics. Every leader eventually steps out of the spotlight, and Duterte is no exception.
7. The “Dam Has Been Broken” Argument Is Wishful Thinking
The article paints a picture of an unstoppable global movement rising against the administration. However, history tells us that genuine revolutions are not sparked by online outrage alone. They require mass mobilization, concrete action, and widespread public support—none of which have materialized in the way this narrative suggests.
Foreign governments “taking notice” does not automatically translate into intervention. The Philippines remains a sovereign nation, and diplomatic relations continue as usual.
Conclusion: The Truth Will Outlive the Hysteria
The claim that the Marcos-Romualdez administration is facing an uncontainable, global rebellion spearheaded by the Filipino diaspora is an overblown, highly dramatized narrative with little basis in reality. While political disagreements are natural, they should be rooted in facts, not fiction.
Filipinos, whether at home or abroad, deserve responsible discourse—not alarmist propaganda designed to stir division. Instead of falling for exaggerated claims, let us focus on constructive engagement and real issues that impact our nation.
Ross is known as the Pambansang Blogger ng Pilipinas - An Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Professional by profession and a Social Media Evangelist by heart.
.jpg)
Post a Comment