Wazzup Pilipinas!?
The political landscape of the Philippines has always been shaped by its leaders’ views on historical events, and one of the most defining moments in the country’s history is the EDSA People Power Revolution of 1986. This event, which led to the ousting of dictator Ferdinand Marcos, remains a deeply polarizing topic, with some hailing it as a victory for democracy while others question its legacy.
A recent comparison of statements from Sara Duterte, the current Vice President and Education Secretary, and formerly the Mayor of Davao City, reveals an apparent shift in her perspective on EDSA. In 2017, she expressed skepticism and resistance toward its significance. By 2024, however, she publicly embraced the revolution’s ideals. The question now is: Has Sara Duterte truly changed her stance, or is this a calculated political move?
Sara Duterte in 2017: A Harsh Critique of EDSA
In a statement dated February 24, 2017, while serving as Davao City Mayor, Sara Duterte voiced a strong disdain for the way EDSA is regarded as the benchmark of freedom in the Philippines.
“I find it hard to understand why this bloodless revolution has become the standard definition of freedom for our country and this standard is forced down our throats by a certain group of individuals who think they are better than everyone else.”
Her words reflect a deep frustration, possibly echoing the sentiments of her father, former President Rodrigo Duterte, who was also critical of the revolution. Many Duterte supporters have long questioned whether EDSA truly benefited the nation or merely replaced one elite with another.
Sara Duterte’s 2017 remarks align with the populist rhetoric that fueled the rise of the Duterte brand—one that challenged the established narratives upheld by those in power before her father’s presidency. By questioning EDSA’s legacy, she positioned herself as a leader willing to break away from mainstream historical interpretations.
Sara Duterte in 2024: A Newfound Appreciation for EDSA?
Fast forward to February 25, 2024, and Sara Duterte, now the country’s Vice President and Education Secretary, presented a very different message on EDSA:
“Let us remember the lessons of Edsa—the power of unity, the strength of the Filipino spirit, and the importance of standing up for what is right. [...] May we continue to uphold the spirit of Edsa in all that we do.”
The stark contrast in tone raises several important questions. Has Sara Duterte genuinely changed her perspective, or is this a strategic political recalibration?
As Vice President and Education Secretary, she holds a significant national leadership role, requiring her to adopt a more unifying stance. Acknowledging the importance of EDSA aligns with the broader historical education expected from someone in her position. It also signals a possible attempt to appeal to a wider audience, particularly those who see EDSA as a defining moment in Philippine democracy.
This shift also coincides with the current administration’s alliance with the Marcos family, whose patriarch was the very dictator overthrown by the revolution. By framing EDSA in a more neutral or positive light, Sara Duterte may be strategically balancing her allegiance to both the Marcoses and the pro-EDSA sectors of society.
The Bigger Picture: A Politician’s Evolution or Political Strategy?
Sara Duterte’s apparent change in stance is not an isolated incident in Philippine politics. Many leaders have adapted their positions over time, often in response to shifting political landscapes.
Political Pragmatism: As a potential future presidential candidate, Sara Duterte must appeal to a broader electorate beyond her father’s core base. Acknowledging EDSA’s significance could be an effort to soften her image and gain support from moderates.
Institutional Role: As Education Secretary, she is responsible for shaping historical education, making it difficult to outright dismiss a pivotal national event. Her new position demands a more balanced perspective.
Marcos-Duterte Alliance: The Bongbong Marcos administration benefits from Duterte’s popularity, and vice versa. By tempering her criticism of EDSA, Sara Duterte avoids unnecessary political friction while maintaining good relations with both Marcos loyalists and pro-democracy advocates.
Final Thoughts: Words vs. Actions
While Sara Duterte’s evolving stance on EDSA is notable, what truly matters is whether her leadership reflects the revolution’s democratic ideals. Will she champion transparency, good governance, and the rule of law? Or is this simply a tactical shift in rhetoric to align with the current political climate?
As the nation watches her next moves, Filipinos must remain vigilant and critical. Political statements can change, but the real test lies in actions, policies, and governance.
One thing remains certain: Sara Duterte’s political journey is far from over, and her evolving stance on EDSA is just one chapter in a much larger narrative.
Post a Comment