Tuesday, April 11, 2023

The International Criminal Court (ICC) versus former President Rodrigo Duterte


Wazzup Pilipinas!?



The ICC (International Criminal Court) is a judicial body established by the Rome Statute in 2002 to investigate and prosecute individuals accused of committing the most serious international crimes, such as genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity, and the crime of aggression. The ICC is headquartered in The Hague, Netherlands and has 123 member states as of September 2021. The Court operates on the principle of complementarity, which means that it can only investigate and prosecute cases if national authorities are unwilling or unable to do so. The ICC has been the subject of controversy and criticism, with some countries and political leaders questioning its jurisdiction and effectiveness.



What are the supposed crimes of Rodrigo Duterte


Rodrigo Duterte, the President of the Philippines, has been accused of various human rights violations and extrajudicial killings during his tenure. The following are some of the supposed crimes of Rodrigo Duterte:

Extrajudicial Killings: Duterte has been accused of promoting and condoning extrajudicial killings as part of his war on drugs. It is alleged that he has encouraged police and vigilantes to execute drug suspects without due process.


Crimes Against Humanity: There have been allegations that Duterte's drug war campaign has led to crimes against humanity, including murder, torture, and enforced disappearances.


War Crimes: Duterte has been accused of committing war crimes against the Moro people in the southern Philippines. These include the bombing of civilian areas, the use of excessive force, and the displacement of thousands of civilians.


Violations of Freedom of Speech: Duterte has been criticized for his attacks on journalists and media outlets critical of his administration. There have been reports of harassment, intimidation, and violence against journalists and media workers.

It is important to note that these accusations have been made by various human rights organizations and international bodies, but the Philippine government and Duterte himself have denied them.



What are the evidences of ICC against Duterte


As of September 2021, the ICC has not yet released any official evidence against President Duterte regarding his alleged involvement in crimes against humanity in the Philippines. However, the ICC prosecutor, Fatou Bensouda, announced in 2018 that her office was conducting a preliminary examination into the situation in the Philippines, focusing on allegations of extrajudicial killings related to Duterte's war on drugs.

In 2020, the ICC prosecutor released a report stating that there was a reasonable basis to believe that crimes against humanity had been committed in the Philippines as part of Duterte's anti-drug campaign. The report cited various sources, including reports from human rights organizations, media, and other stakeholders, as well as testimonies from victims and their families.

The report also stated that there was evidence suggesting that Duterte had knowledge of and may have contributed to the commission of these crimes, although it did not provide specific details or evidence regarding Duterte's personal involvement.

It is important to note that the ICC's preliminary examination is still ongoing, and no charges have been filed against Duterte or any other individuals in connection with the alleged crimes in the Philippines. The ICC will only proceed with a formal investigation if it determines that there is sufficient evidence to support the allegations.




Does the ICC have jurisdiction over the Philippines to prosecute Duterte for his crimes and what would be the penalties or punishment given to Duterte


The ICC has jurisdiction over the Philippines to prosecute individuals for international crimes, including crimes against humanity, if they were committed on the territory of the Philippines or by Philippine nationals. This is because the Philippines is a State Party to the Rome Statute, which is the treaty that established the ICC.

However, in March 2019, the Philippines withdrew from the Rome Statute, effective one year later. This means that the ICC can no longer prosecute crimes committed after the withdrawal date unless they were committed when the Philippines was still a State Party. Therefore, if the ICC decides to bring charges against Duterte, it would have to prove that the crimes in question were committed before the withdrawal date, which was March 17, 2019.

Regarding the penalties or punishment that Duterte would face if he were convicted of crimes against humanity by the ICC, the maximum sentence is life imprisonment. However, it is important to note that the ICC is a court of last resort, which means that it can only prosecute cases if national authorities are unwilling or unable to do so. If the ICC decides to prosecute Duterte, it would be because the Philippine authorities have not taken appropriate action to investigate and prosecute the alleged crimes.





Has Philippine authorities investigated about the crimes of Duterte


The Philippine government has initiated investigations into some of the alleged human rights violations and extrajudicial killings that have occurred during Duterte's tenure, but many human rights organizations have criticized these investigations as inadequate and lacking in impartiality.

In 2019, the Philippine Department of Justice announced that it would conduct a review of thousands of cases of alleged extrajudicial killings related to Duterte's war on drugs. However, as of September 2021, no charges have been filed against any police officers or government officials for their role in these killings.

There have also been several independent investigations and reports by human rights organizations into the situation in the Philippines. In 2018, the United Nations Human Rights Council released a report stating that there was a "near impunity" for the perpetrators of extrajudicial killings in the Philippines, and called for an independent investigation into these crimes.

Despite these calls for accountability, Duterte and other Philippine officials have consistently denied any wrongdoing and defended their anti-drug campaign as necessary for maintaining law and order in the country.




Will the ICC be successful in the implementation of their authority over the Philippines


The success of the ICC's authority over the Philippines will depend on various factors, including political will, international cooperation, and the availability of evidence. As I mentioned earlier, the Philippines withdrew from the Rome Statute in 2019, which means that the ICC can only prosecute crimes committed before the withdrawal date. In addition, the Philippine government has expressed its opposition to the ICC's involvement in the country and has accused the Court of interfering in its domestic affairs.

Furthermore, the ICC relies on the cooperation of national authorities and international partners to arrest and surrender suspects, provide evidence, and enforce its judgments. If the Philippine government refuses to cooperate with the ICC, it could be difficult for the Court to implement its authority effectively.

However, it is important to note that the ICC is a judicial institution, and its decisions are based on legal and factual considerations, not political or diplomatic considerations. If the ICC determines that there is sufficient evidence to support charges against Duterte or other individuals, it may proceed with an investigation and prosecution regardless of any opposition from the Philippine government.

In summary, the success of the ICC's authority over the Philippines will depend on various factors, and it is difficult to predict the outcome at this point.

No comments:

Post a Comment