Monday, August 8, 2016
Questions and Concerns Regarding Duterte's List of Drug Personalities
Wazzup Pilipinas!
I laud the government's resolve in pursuing its anti-drug campaign, particularly in bringing to justice alleged narco-politicians, judges and bad cops who have contributed and/or benefited from the drug menace.
However, I would like to raise some questions and concerns on how this war is being waged, especially on the latest list made public by President Duterte.
Case build-ups and dangerous precedent
Is the list the result of judicious case build-ups? Is it backed up by sufficient evidence that can stand the scrutiny of our courts? Will the government file the appropriate charges?
Does this not set a dangerous precedent? Does this not violate due process? What prevents other public officials from making their own lists? What prevents them from including in the list political rivals, dissidents and activists? Whatever happened to the foundation of the judicial system and respect for individual liberties and rights, where one is presumed innocent until proven guilty?
EO on FOI to access information on "drug personalities"
Can the public, through the recently signed Executive Order on Freedom of Information, access the information which merited the inclusion of the said public officials in the list? The public deserves to know. The government's war on drugs must be information-driven. It must be free from the influence of political bias, vendetta and rivalry. Information must be judiciously vetted and not violative of the rule of law.
I believe democracy was never about the President's absolute power to determine innocence or guilt. The Executive cannot blacken the reputations of people and judge them at will. The responsibility to prosecute and judge falls upon our judicial system.
Sadly, the President's list, while it may be motivated by good intentions, preempts the court's judgment and tears at the very fabric of our democracy. Worse, it might only serve the interests of the very drug lords that this crackdown is directed at, such as the example of Mexico where, ironically, the main beneficiaries of a peace and order-centric war on drugs are criminal organizations.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Ang Pambansang Blog ng Pilipinas Wazzup Pilipinas and the Umalohokans.
Ang Pambansang Blog ng Pilipinas celebrating 10th year of online presence
I have read your whole blog, you have written very well. By the way, I am a student of IT and am taking the services of Assignment Help Online service. I haven't read much about the law but thank you for learning something new from your blog.
ReplyDeleteDo you need online class help? Tell us to Do My Class Online and we will provide you the best online class takers. Take my online class for me in cheap!
ReplyDeleteThank you for sharing this thought-provoking piece. Duterte's list of drug personalities raises significant questions about due process and individual rights. Transparency, accountability, and the accuracy of such lists are crucial for ensuring justice. It's important to critically analyze these issues and their impact on society. Looking forward to more discussions!
ReplyDeleteAbogado de Inmigración en Falls Church VA
Abogado de Inmigración Familiar Cerca de MÃ
The controversial "Duterte drug list" has raised concerns about its accuracy, fairness, and impact. Questions include the selection of individuals, transparency, impact on individuals, human rights issues, political and legal ramifications, and the effectiveness of the war on drugs. Concerns include the risk of including innocent individuals, potential extrajudicial actions, political motivation, and the need for a balance between combating drug-related crime and respecting individuals' rights. philadelphia immigration lawyers lawyer is a professional who plays a vital role in society by providing legal advice, representing clients in legal matters, and ensuring the fair administration of justice.
ReplyDelete